We're all in this together...but some of us are IN more than others!
A catch phrase I often hear in support of big government and social programs is, "We're all in this together." It never fails to elicit a warm and fuzzy feeling of security in a time of need. I believe it is appropriate to other things like sports teams, armies, or families, but in the context of society at large, I find it a troublesome notion.
Evolutionary Psychologists have a concept for the notion of, "We're all in this together!"; it is called Reciprocal Altruism. The idea behind reciprocal altruism is that an individual is willing to risk a small portion of his own personal security, food, energy or other asset, to help another individual, so long as there is a reasonable expectation the act will be reciprocated at some point in the future. In the exchange, both individuals benefit, and are more secure working together. This concept makes sense; the logic works and it is intuitive. In essence it is the "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours", principle of life.
Reciprocal altruism only works if certain conditions are met. In addition to the conditions of mutual benefit, there must also be a mechanism to detect "cheating", lest some individuals be exploited in the arrangement. Robert Wright has explored the concept to good effect in his books "The Moral Animal" and "Non-Zero", where he demonstrates how this phenomenon can significantly improve the fitness or reproductive success of the individuals or groups involved in the exchange. There is no doubt that Reciprocal Altruism, under the proper conditions, is a good thing.
There are many systems of reciprocal altruism in nature. The most fundamental examples among humans are families, clans or small villages. Reciprocal altruism works well on this scale. Individuals are united toward many common goals and share burdens to the common benefit. In such a context, it is also simple to detect cheating. If an individual is disruptive or is not pulling his weight, it is obvious and he can be quickly reprimanded and brought into line, or ostracized altogether. As communities grow beyond the size of a village, many of the benefits remain, but it becomes more difficult to detect cheating and to effectively sanction against it. The system then begins to have pockets of corruption and exploitation.
Our nation was founded as a rather broad system of reciprocal altruism. Individuals, towns, and in turn, entire colonies sacrificed a portion of autonomy and resources to gain the benefits of harmony, commerce and the security of numbers. Benjamin Franklin characterized the urgency of cooperation in these colorfully poignant terms just prior to signing the Declaration of Independence in 1776:
"We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
The language of the Preamble to our Constitution also clearly lays out the expectations in this regard:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The founding fathers clearly envisioned a very large system of reciprocal altruism to which we would ALL contribute, with the expectation of receiving benefits in kind, and in which we would all be free to enjoy the blessings of liberty and freedom. The success and prosperity of the United States is a testimony to their vision and to the benefits of reciprocal altruism.
For all it's good, our system of reciprocal altruism has not been without problems because we have not been effective in dealing with cheaters. If you are a student of history, you know the system rolled along tolerably well for something like four score and seven years. At that point many decided there wasn't enough reciprocity going on to offset the sacrifice, and chose to quit the Union. I recommend the work of Thomas Dilorenzo to learn the real economic story behind the War Between the States, or the War of Northern Agression as it known by many. No matter what your conclusions about the war and the cause, the bottom line is that some among us were no longer feeling the love for our system of reciprocal altruism, and wanted out. In response, President Abraham Lincoln made war, and changed our system forever, from one of reciprocal altruism, to one of mandatory cooperation and unity at threat of death.
With a population of taxable workers in thrall and paying tribute, our government has grown to immense proportions never imagined by the founders. Not only has this government spent every dime they can extort from the worker, their irresponsible borrowing to spend for entitlements, social programs, wars and police actions around the globe, ineffective agencies and bureaucracies, bailing out failing business ventures, and legislative pork, have put us trillions of dollars into debt, with no end in sight. At the risk of hyperbole, I believe that in effect, the working American toils every day at gunpoint to fund an out of control, irresponsible and financially insolvent government.
Although I resent paying over half of the money I earn in taxes under duress, I concede there are benefits to our flawed system of reciprocal altruism. Furthermore, I retain a love of this country, and it is my belief that those of us who are fortunate to enjoy the fruits of it have a vested interest to keep the faith and to get back on the path the founders intended. I am committed to that, but I think it is fair to expect that cheating and exploitation will be dealt with immediately so that the productive can keep more of what they earn. We must cut entitlement spending, spending on unnecessary foreign military actions, and institute immigration policies that protect the American worker from the weight of cheating illegals who pay no taxes but burden our education, medical and social programs. We must insist on a moratorium against all growth in government, including publicly funded health care, and elect legislators who live within their means.
I am fiercely independent, and I value Liberty above all else. Since Abraham Lincoln valued Union above all else, our sensibilities can never align. However, there is much to admire about the man, and there is at least one statement he made with which I agree:
"You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative andindependence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves."
It is time for those who claim, "We're all in this together!", to take a stand against cheaters and exploitation instead of expecting those of us who truly are IN to give more.